|
|
02 buick lasabre 3.8 P0453
|
|
|
| |
|
dr.donut
User
Aug 13, 2018, 9:50 AM
Post #1 of 11
(1745 views)
|
02 buick lasabre 3.8 P0453
|
|
|
P0453 comes up as pending and comfirmed right after clearing it , trying to get an inspection , should I just replace the sensor or is there something else I should check , the mech. says it's by the gas tank , thanks
|
|
| |
|
Discretesignals
Ultimate Carjunky
/ Moderator
Aug 13, 2018, 10:23 AM
Post #2 of 11
(1741 views)
|
Re: 02 buick lasabre 3.8 P0453
|
|
|
You going to have to do some voltage checks at the sensor and do a good visual inspection of the connector and terminals to determine if it is the sensor or not. Black is ground Grey is 5 volt with key on Dark green is the signal wire. If you unplug it, you should have 5 volts. If all that is good, more than like you have a failed sensor. The fuel tank pressure sensor is on top of the sending unit. You can get to it by removing the floor access panel in the trunk. Since we volunteer our time and knowledge, we ask for you to please follow up when a problem is resolved.
|
|
| |
|
dr.donut
User
Aug 13, 2018, 11:02 AM
Post #3 of 11
(1733 views)
|
Re: 02 buick lasabre 3.8 P0453
|
|
|
o.k. thanks
|
|
| |
|
dr.donut
User
Aug 13, 2018, 11:48 AM
Post #4 of 11
(1726 views)
|
Re: 02 buick lasabre 3.8 P0453
|
|
|
I pulled the disconnect and got the 5 volts at the gray wire , the green wire had nothing but being a signal wire it would have to be plugged in to get a voltage ? ?
|
|
| |
|
Discretesignals
Ultimate Carjunky
/ Moderator
Aug 13, 2018, 8:10 PM
Post #5 of 11
(1699 views)
|
Re: 02 buick lasabre 3.8 P0453
|
|
|
Make sure the black wire is a good ground and then unplug the sensor and turn the ignition on to see if you get dtc P0452 to show up? If you do, replace the sensor. The factory diagram contradicts the troubleshooting chart. The pressure sensor circuit is probably a pull up design and not a pull down as in the diagram. Since we volunteer our time and knowledge, we ask for you to please follow up when a problem is resolved.
(This post was edited by Discretesignals on Aug 13, 2018, 8:29 PM)
|
|
| |
|
dr.donut
User
Aug 14, 2018, 3:42 PM
Post #6 of 11
(1664 views)
|
Re: 02 buick lasabre 3.8 P0453
|
|
|
I got the new part to put in wed. morn. the P0452 should be there when I clear the codes , then when the monitors get down to only one I can get the sticker . they allow one
|
|
| |
|
dr.donut
User
Aug 17, 2018, 4:30 AM
Post #7 of 11
(1635 views)
|
Re: 02 buick lasabre 3.8 P0453
|
|
|
The P0452 was there , cleared the codes and after 50 miles + nothing has come up so I think it's good , thanks .
|
|
| |
|
Hammer Time
Ultimate Carjunky
/ Moderator
Aug 17, 2018, 6:01 AM
Post #8 of 11
(1633 views)
|
Re: 02 buick lasabre 3.8 P0453
|
|
|
You may have cleared the code but check to see if the monitors have completed yet. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We offer help in answering questions, clarifying things or giving advice but we are not a substitute for an on-site inspection by a professional.
|
|
| |
|
dr.donut
User
Aug 17, 2018, 8:28 AM
Post #9 of 11
(1625 views)
|
Re: 02 buick lasabre 3.8 P0453
|
|
|
The evap. mon. is still there I guess it takes a while , the catalyst mon. is too ,, O2 sensor heater came back o.k. once one of those last two inc.'s " O.K. " I'll be good to go
|
|
| |
|
dr.donut
User
Aug 20, 2018, 11:04 AM
Post #10 of 11
(1585 views)
|
Re: 02 buick lasabre 3.8 P0453
|
|
|
The EVAP mon. went cleared after 6 days and I got the sticker with the one catalyst mon. I put in a new coolant temp. sensor so I'll keep watching to see if it goes off just for educational purposes , thanks
|
|
| |
|
Hammer Time
Ultimate Carjunky
/ Moderator
Aug 20, 2018, 11:46 AM
Post #11 of 11
(1583 views)
|
Re: 02 buick lasabre 3.8 P0453
|
|
|
You're posting the same answer to two different threads. We only need one going on this subject so I'll close this one now. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We offer help in answering questions, clarifying things or giving advice but we are not a substitute for an on-site inspection by a professional.
|
|
| |
|